The Georgia Supreme Court may have set a legal precedent over the use of rap music in court. In a 7-2 ruling, the highest court in the state overturned the murder conviction of Morgan Baker.
In 2019, Baker was convicted after prosecutors showed a rap video where he waved a gun. They were seeking to show that Baker had a history of violence by using the rap video as evidence.
However, Justice Sarah Hawkins Warren ruled that the use of the rap video was prejudicial to Baker.
“The rap music video was highly prejudicial,” Justice Warren wrote. “It allowed the State to introduce impermissible propensity evidence by portraying Baker as a threatening gunman, and the prosecutor severely exacerbated the video’s prejudicial impact by emphasizing that it showed Baker’s predisposition to gun violence.”
The ruling could have a major impact on the YSL RICO case which centers around Atlanta rapper Young Thug.
In the YSL case, Judge Ural Glanville ruled that 17 different lyrics can be used as evidence against rapper Young Thug (whose legal name is Jeffrey Williams) and his co-defendants. Thus far, the jury has seen one music video and multiple images of alleged gang signs and weapons that were posted on social media.
Young Thug’s lawyer Brian Steel said that the use of rap lyrics in court is a violation of the First Amendment. “They are targeting the right to free speech, and that’s wrong. They are saying that just because he his singing about it, he is now part of a crime.”
And Doug Weinstein, the attorney for defendant Yak Gotti, said that rap music is the only genre in entertainment that allows rap lyrics to be used as evidence in legal cases.
“We are asking essentially for the same thing that the state is, use the Georgia law,” Weinstein said. “As Professor Dennis at the University of Georgia says, ‘rap is the only fictional art form treated this way. No other musical genre and no other art is used in the…
Read the full article here
