But this problem is bigger than New York. One state government purposely penalizing the people of other states is un-American. So much for “e pluribus unum.”
As I’ve reflected on the twin challenges of migration and border security, I’ve tried to remember three basic things:
- Those fleeing oppression and violence are just like so many Americans’ ancestors. We need to treat them with the decency we would want for our own families if they were in the same situation.
- We need to remember, beyond the many emotions that these issues elicit, the very practical reality faced by America and most of the industrialized world: Birth rates are plummeting, populations are aging and labor is increasingly scarce. Unless we determine the right way to receive more immigrants, our way of life is in danger. In other words, the absence of immigration would collectively threaten us more than the problems caused by the current migrant crisis.
- Many millions of Americans, of all political stripes, have legitimate concerns about immigration and border security. They worry about safety, about stretched local resources, about the evident lack of order and consistency that pervades our broken immigration system. They have a damn good point.
With these three points in mind, I still see a pathway out of this mess.
I’m a Democrat and a progressive. But I also believe it’s time for stronger and more effective border security. And I think a more coherent, efficient and well-resourced asylum process will help achieve that goal.
I propose accepting Republican demands for greater border security in exchange for full funding of a humane and functioning asylum process.
But until there is consensus in Washington on those solutions, which won’t be easy, I worry even more about the political crisis these issues are causing and what it means for the future of our democracy.
And here’s where my argument, based on the previously mentioned principles, gets controversial.
I propose accepting…
Read the full article here
