In the wake of Donald Trump’s 2020 election defeat, far too many outrageous lawsuits were filed by Republicans displeased with the results, but Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton was responsible for one of the most outlandish cases.
In case anyone needs a refresher, the Texas Republican — who also chaired the Lawyers for Trump group — filed suit targeting the election results out of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, building his weak case around their pandemic-era election procedures. Paxton, with the backing of many GOP lawmakers in Congress, went so far as to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to block those states from voting in the Electoral College.
Reuters’ Brad Heath explained at the time, Paxton was “literally asking the Supreme Court to throw out the results of other states’ presidential elections, set aside the millions of votes cast in states that are not Texas, and have other state legislatures make Trump president.”
As failed legal gambits go, this was quite bonkers. Of course, in our system of justice, lawyers who push bonkers legal gambits run the risk of facing sanctions for professional misconduct. With this in mind, as regular readers may recall, the Texas bar association last spring moved forward with an investigation into the state attorney general and his anti-election efforts.
Paxton tried to dismiss the case. As Reuters reported this week, that didn’t go well.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton must face an ethics lawsuit by state attorney regulators over a case he brought challenging results of the 2020 election, according to a court ruling posted on Monday. Judge Casey Blair on Friday denied Paxton’s bid to dismiss the case on jurisdictional grounds.
The report added that Paxton, by way of a defense, argued that his work as Texas’ top lawyer “was beyond the reach of Texas attorney ethics regulators.” That apparently proved unpersuasive.
The case still has a long way to go, but if the state attorney general loses, he…
Read the full article here
