It has been almost a decade since Netflix announced Peter Morgan’s incredibly ambitious opus “The Crown.” The plan was to cover the life of then-living Queen Elizabeth II from her marriage in 1947 to her Diamond Jubilee in 2012, with three full casts.
Season six, part one, which is out out Thursday, may make King Charles (or at least his allies) happy. But it also proves time has not been kind to Morgan’s goal of being the official chronicler of the Second Elizabethan Age.
Time has not been kind to Peter Morgan’s goal of being the official chronicler of the Second Elizabethan Age.
Season six picks up in the spring of 1997. Tony Blair (Bertie Carvel) has just swept into power with the new Labour movement, and Princess Diana (Elizabeth Debicki) is about to meet Dodi Fayed (Khalid Abdalla) for an ill-fated summer romance that will end in Paris. Back home in the U.K., Elizabeth (Imelda Staunton) and Philip (Jonathan Pryce) are once again utterly out of step with the political times, irritated that their eldest son, Charles (Dominic West), is practically measuring the palace windows for curtains and trying to come to grips with the depressing reality that divorce did not solve their Diana problem. In fact, arguably this royal debacle is only getting worse, as the crown can no longer control her. It also has no way of keeping her safe from her poor choices.
Those poor choices include getting into a car in Paris without putting on her seat belt with a drunken chauffeur at the wheel. And thus, dramatically, ends part one. Part two will be out next month. But ending the series with Diana’s passing feels like an odd choice — for many reasons.
From the outset, it was obvious that Morgan’s series was pro-royalist propaganda. Like Shakespeare before him, Morgan angled his history play to flatter the current monarch. However, Shakespeare at least waited a few hundred years before spinning his tales. Sometimes, the present day has worked in Morgan’s favor, such…
Read the full article here